Alex
Oud Fan
Right but there is no way to know what material was actually submitted for your lab tests. We have no idea if there is a bait and switch going on.
Again - 90% of the people who are disagreeing with you are not vendors here. This is not a cabal plot against your company. You seem to be doing fine with your bags of money and royal clientele. If your past engagement with mods or leadership on this forum was poor and people took the time to complain about stuff you sold them, it must have happened enough times for it to be looked into seriously. It's not like some newbie bought your wares and complained and then with no investigating, they decided against you. It must have been repeated. @EJayB has experience distilling oils himself so if he says your wares were shite, I'm inclined to trust him. For the record, I'm pretty sure when those messages went back and forth between you guys @EJayB wasn't even a vendor here yet. Just a regular ouddict member.
- with all respect I don't know the people here, and I honestly care about facts that opinions. again we had over 1000 order wit hall the other credentials I listed don't you think it's little strange that the only people complaining are here? don't you think it's straight that those who complain don't want to try the oil or samplers before buying and then when they get it and complain they don't want to return it and get a refund refund? don't you think it's also strange that they are saying things like, it's bad, horrible and , synthetic and still don't want to return it? finally don't think all those experts and people who bought is and claimed it is synthetic non of them came with a single evidence or prove?
Trust is earned not given. Ouddict is a circle of trust. Members trust that leadership will properly vet vendors. You come in with information about no kynam/kyara existing. We read it. Contemplated the info you provided. Digested it. Considered the logic you provided. Disagreed with you. And moved on. Then you posted it again (2x for some reason). We disagreed with you because:
- sorry to tell you that you didn't understood perfumery, in art and perfumery there is no leadership, if you think you should buy your oils and like and dislike scents because of what leadership promote and tell you then my friend we fundamentally disagree.
Your lab tests are unverified.
- wrong, (again with all respect you don;t now what you are talking about or you haven't looked at it) it is from a top USA lab, the lab details there and the reference number there, the person who done it have their name and signature and the person who supervised the process have their name and signature both are PHD and experts in their field so please don't say thing that are wrong or make accusation you don't know. (the lab test is here and published on all our accounts)
We have no proof what material was submitted.
- the materials submitted are the materials that the lab test was done for and this is the problem I don't know if you guys really don't understand or refuse to understand, I'm not trying to sell you anything I'm saying this is a test for cultivated kinam wood, I'm not selling or even saying I'm offering wild kinma like many of the vendors here, who haven't provide any prove or evidence so in other words, you believe someone telling you I have wild kinam for sale but don't believe someone telling you all kinam is cultivated including mine and here is a lab test for it (what kind of sense is that)
These could be fake or old or simply tests of different material other than what you are representing.
- I'm not representing anything or anyone, I talk about my self and our house, I listed the test here for everyone to see an challenged anyone to do the same and no one did and no one will do, so you are saying I could be making a test in my company name with pictures and details and then sell something else but the people selling things with no test and not check what so even are all true.
For me this is the biggest logical fallacy. Why should we believe these tests are testing what you say they are?
- dear you don't have to believe anything I'm not here to make you believe, or impose any idea or thought on you not sure why you think I want you to believe anything on the contrary I want you to doubt, I want you to doubt me, doubt those who try to sell you wild kinam with no prove and doubt those who say things that are not backed up scientifically , you believe what you can't prove as what is proven doesn't require believe, I didn't told you I have kiman that I'm selling and it's wild for you to believe me like other vendors and sellers, I listed a lab test with the highest scientific credential procedure and academic standers of testing.
How can we trust you are qualified to know what the material is in the first place, enough so that you know what to submit for testing?
- I don't know actually to be honest I have no clue other than scent and burn profile and taste sometimes, and that is exactly why we do a test and that is exactly why we hire a botanist to recognize and address each one of those elements, and that is exactly why we spend so much money and time to know, as if I know (or thought I do) and was a vendor here vouched fro by the "leadership" I would've sold you something I'm not sure about and I will never do that and that is exactly why we do a lab test. I'm not sure if you familiar with how a lab test is done but I;m sure you can ask and read.
The smoke test: this is an impossible litmus test. A bar too high. Too many variables to factor in. Sometimes when I light an incense stick and am very still, the smoke goes up in a straight line for a meter. But it's not kyara lol. So this test is already a non starter. If something else has the exact same smoke effect, than you can't say that your test exclusively determines authentic kyara vs non authentic kyara lol.
- yes you are very true there are many variables, and yes the air and the wind the heat and the density and the fire temperature all effect that, still if you read this book or do some research which I strongly recommend, you will find that the smoke if effected directly by some materials that are fossilized planet based bacteria those materials will make the smoke go in a straight line due to the molecular level of the material which is similar to the bee heaves (in shape but of course much smaller) this molecular foundation will act like a group of small channels that when the material is burned the smoked is pushed throughout the channels and this makes it tend to go vertical in a straight line do to the pressure and heat, this is similar to blowing smoke in thin straw and seeing it going far in a straight line (if you can imagine the picture) now I have explained the ultimate mystery of the straight smoke which I don't think it's a mystery at all as anyone with decent knowledge of chemistry or incense making should know that. I hope you get the idea and all other members get the idea so I don't have to keep answering and addressing why the smoke get in a straight line.
We live in a fast paced world. A book written years ago is probably filled with things that have been proven to be no longer accurate.
- have you read the book ? I don't think you did, please do before making an assumption as if you read it you will realize that the research done is not matter of opinion and it is simply scientific testing done with details and accuracy and basic categorization of species, but still if you think there is any inaccuracy, mistakes of outdated information please let me know and I'm sure miss rozi and the team of scientist in that Indonesian university who have been researching and studying agarwood will be very interested to know it.
Regardless if you claim the book is a leading authority in kyara - the fact that this 1 meter of smoke thing is mentioned in it as a logical experiment for determining kyara authenticity makes it super suspect.
- this is one simple behavior that the wood will act as when burn it is not the determining test (I have explained why above)
That's hardly a scientific process.
- I think that is up to the PHD and scientist who wrote the book to say and not to you or me, we have to be humble in our statements.
It's funny that on one hand you are all about lab testing but also this smoke test. Polar scientific opposites.
- they go side by side they don't oppose and if you read the book you will have a better understanding.
Look man - can't we just agree to disagree?
- I can't ask you or make you agree with anything but we agree with science and solid research done by certified experts.