powdernose
Oud Sprite
I can recall a time in the mid/late 90's a site called Arabian Bazaar or something to that affect, they sold oil from the M.E. houses, names of oil such as Dehn Al Oud Qadeem, Seufi, Moattaq was there with price; no mention if blended, pure, wood grade, distillation parameter, etc.
us "oud geeky", clamor for more and more information, and we've actually gotten it. The irony is that for many, as more info is given there is more speculation and suspicion on it's validity.
And it has been proven, that products following the line of those 90's products, by and large, were impure and insufficient. Yet many are still blissfully unaware of such products' purity. And others still, remain proponents of their quality.
Have we progressed enough in our oudication that questioning should stop?
Have we run out of questions? Run out of doubts?
Or are you suggesting, that since we should be grateful that we are not still stuck in the 90s, that we should silence further doubts?
Regarding speculation and suspicion, these are not formed out of thin air.
To use one of your own analogies; where there is smoke there is fire.
Lastly, remember the oud game is a dirty game, so there's theivery, deceit, backstabbing, stealing of oils, wood, etc, of that I'm sure despite not having concrete evidence. But, where there's smoke....
Some will get it, some won't.
My repeated opinion on certain matters, however pragmatic, is not intended to confound or annoy but to share and provide my perspective and provoke thought, nothing more. Forgive me in advance if I'm wrong, but from the line of question as well as that below, I can only presume that you'd prefer my censoring of my contribution or that it align with your own. Is either the case?
No Pearl, I do not wish to censor or proselytise anyone.
By the same token that you inquired into Rasoul's etiology, I inquired into yours. The phrasing should have made the analogy clear.
Also, if your position on a matter is immovable, and your opinion on that matter well documented and well known,
why enter the discussion?
I took a panoramic view and found a solution that suits me and I'm not recruiting anyone to follow, just sharing.
Why not? My opinion on certain matters, however pragmatic, is not intended to confound or annoy but to share and provide my perspective and provoke thought, nothing more.
Because it doesn't answer any of the questions posed, and because it derails focus from these questions.
(re being in favour of buyer awareness)
Why?
I already answered that.
""
I know you mean well, but more often than not, it seems like you are laying blame on the 'gullible' for accepting the stories or on "irresponsible spending".
""
And because you seem more than willing to accept the status quo.
I believe we have both made our points crystal clear.
I don't wish to hijack the thread any further, if you'd like to discuss any of the above with me, please PM me.
Last edited: